Lampau Dan Sekarang: Analisis Kompetensi Absolut Dalam Perselisihan Hak Pada Pengadilan Agama

Xavier Nugraha, Fariz Rachman Iqbal, Ridho Firmansyah, Giovanni Dinda Cahyawati

Abstract


religious justice is limited to 6 (six) areas, namely marriage, inheritance, will, hibah, waqf, and shadaqah. Further, in Article 50 of Law 7/1989 it is stated, that if there is a dispute of rights related to the areas in Article 49 paragraph (1), then it must be decided in a state court. In its development, related to the absolute competence of this religious court underwent changes with the birth of Law 3/2006. In Law 3/2006, in addition to related to the addition of absolute competence, there is also the addition of Article 50 paragraph (2) which regulates related to the dispute of rights to be the absolute competence of religious justice. Based on this background, then the formulation of the problem in this study is First, what is the absolute competence of the religious court? and Second, does the religious court have the authority to investigate disputes? This research is a normative legal research with legal, conceptual, and case regulatory approaches. Based on this research, it was found that First, in Law 3/2006, there are 3 (three) new areas of absolute competence in religious justice into marriage, heirs, wills, grants, waqf, zakat, infaq, shadaqah, and shariqah economics and in Law 3/2006 has removed the existence of the right of choice in matters of inheritance for Muslims, so it must absolutely go through religious justice and Second, with the addition of Article 50 paragraph (2) of Law 3/2006, then in the case of disputes, then if the fellow Muslims, then can directly through the courts in the religious judicial environment. This, in order to realize a quick, simple, and lightweight trial

Keywords


absolut competency, religious court, dispute of rights

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adami Chazami. Pelajaran Hukum Perdata: Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori- Teori Pemidanaan Dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1991.

Alfitri. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Tafsiran Resmi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 2 (2014): 297–314.

Aziz, Mokhamad Abdul. “Pilkada Serentak Melalui DPRD: Sebuah Gagasan Mewujudkan Pilkada Demokratis Perspektif Pancasila Dan UUD 1945.” Politik IndonesiaIndonesian Political Science Review 1, no. 2 (2016): 154–170.

Crouch, Melissa. “Constitutionalism, Islam and the Practice of Religious Deference: The Case of the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Australian Journal of Asian Law 16, no. 2 (2016): 1–15.

Dadan, Mutaqien. “Hak Opsi Sebagai Kewarisan Dalam Tragedi Hukum.” Al Mawarid 7, no. 1 (1999): 34–44.

Gumbira, Seno Wibowo. “Problematika Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pasca SEMA RI No. 7 Tahun 2014 (Suatu Analisa Yuridis Dan Asas-Asas Dalam Hukum Peradilan Pidana).” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 46, no. 1 (2016): 106.

Hantoro, Novianto M. “Kajian Yuridis Pembentukan Undang-Undang Tentang Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia.” Negara Hukum 3, no. 2 (2012): 154–180.

Harahap, M. Yahya. “Berbagai Permasalahan Formil Dalam Gugatan Perdata.” Varia Peradilan, Majalah hukum Ikahi, 1993.

———. Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Edisi Kedu. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.

Hutchinson, Terry. Researching and Writing in Law. Sydney: Lawbook Co, 2002.

Konstitusi, Mahkamah, and Republik Indonesia. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan UUD Buku VI Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Vol. 53, 2010.

Lina Kushidayati. “Hak Opsi Dan Hukum Waris Islam Di Indonesia.” Al-Manahij 7, no. 1 (2013): 53–64.

Manan, Bagir, and Susi Dwi Harijanti. “Saat Rakyat Bicara: Demokrasi Dan Kesejahteraan.” Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2014): 1–18.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum : Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017.

———. “Penelitian Hukum.” Yuridika 16, no. 1 (2001): 103.

Muabezi, Zahermann Armandz. “Negara Berdasarkan Hukum (Rechtsstaats) Bukan Kekuasaan (Machtsstaat).” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 6, no. 4 (2017): 421–446.

Muhammad, Mukmin. “Independensi Yudisial Sebagai Pilar Dari Suatu Negara Hukum.” Meraja Journal 1, no. 1 (2018): 1–8.

Nugraha, Xavier, Risdiana Izzaty, and Annida Aqiila Putri. “Rekonstruksi Batas Usia Minimal Perkawinan Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum” 3, no. 1 (2019): 40–54.

Nugraha, Xavier, John Eno Prasito Putra, and Krishna Darari Hamonangan Putra. “Analisa Daluarsa Gugatan Pembatalan Perjanjian Akibat Adanya Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheiden).” Galuh Justisi 8, no. 1 (2020): 54–72.

Nugraha, Xavier, Patricia Inge Felany, and M Imron Rosyadi. "Analisis Upaya Pemerintah Meminimalisir Risiko Gagal Bayar Dalam Pemberian Pinjaman Kepada BUMN", Majalah Hukum 50, no.1 (2020) : 61-81

R., Soeroso. Yurisprudensi Hukum Acara Perdata Bagian 1 Tentang Kompetensi Kewenangan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Rosalinda. “Prinsip Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Anak Luar Kawin.” Universitas Airlangga, 2019.

Satriawan, Iwan, and Tanto Lailam. “Open Legal Policy Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (2019): 559.

Sunarno. “Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis.” Wacana Hukum 10, no. 1 (2011): 41–62.

Susylawati, Eka. “Penerapan Asas Personalitas Keislaman Dalam Permohonan Pengangkatan Anak Di Kabupaten Pamekasan.” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 11, no. 2 (2017): 409.

Sutomo, Moh, Syarifah Warohmah Marwiyah, and Nur Mawaddah. “Akar Historis Pengadilan Agama Masa Orde Baru.” Yudisia 7, no. 2 (2016): 264–284.

Wahyono, Juanda, and Widya N. Rosari. “The Implementation Of Constitutional Court Decision Number: 93/PUU-X/2012 In Disputessettlement Of Syariah Bank Financing At The Court For Religionaffairs Of Bengkulu City.” Bengkoelen Justice 7, no. 2 (2012).

Zaman, Muhammad Rutabuz. “Mendudukkan Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Agama Dalam Sengketa Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Pada Bank Syariah.” Jurnal Studi islam Miyah 14, no. 2 (2018): 148–159.

Zulkarnain Suleman. “Asas Personalitas Keislaman Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI).” Al-Mizan 9, no. 1 (2013): 181–192.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v4i2.799

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Xavier Nugraha, Fariz Rachman Iqbal, Ridho Firmansyah, Giovanni Dinda Cahyawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed by:

  

 


 

License

© Copyright CC BY-SA

web analytics View My Stats

Mizan, p-ISSN: 2598-974X, e-ISSN: 2598-6252